Serious adverse event following immunization and thromboembolic events associated with COVID19 vaccination: An analysis of nationwide causality assessment from India.

BACKGROUND: Vaccines against the COVID-19 pandemic were introduced in late 2020. The present study has been conducted to study the serious Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFIs) reported for COVID-19 vaccines from India. METHODS: Secondary data analysis of the causality assessment reports for the 1112 serious AEFIs published by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, was conducted. For the current analysis, all the reports published till 29.03.2022 were included. The primary outcome variables analyzed were the consistent causal association and the thromboembolic events. RESULTS: The majority of the serious AEFIs assessed were either coincidental (578, 52%) or vaccine product related (218, 19.6%). All the serious AEFIs were reported among the Covishield (992, 89.2%) and COVAXIN (120, 10.8%) vaccines. Among these, 401 (36.1%) were deaths, and 711 (63.9%) were hospitalized and recovered. On adjusted analysis, females, the younger age group and non-fatal AEFIs showed a statistically significant consistent causal association with COVID-19 vaccination. Thromboembolic events were reported among 209 (18.8%) of the analyzed participants, with a significant association with higher age and case fatality rate. CONCLUSION: Deaths reported under serious AEFIs were found to have a relatively lower consistent causal relationship with the COVID-19 vaccines than the recovered hospitalizations in India. No consistent causal association was found between the thromboembolic events and the type of COVID-19 vaccine administered in India.

Single ascending dose safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic study of econazole in healthy volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: Econazole has been found efficacious as antitubercular in in vitro and in vivo animal studies. However, limited information is available for its safety and pharmacokinetics in humans. In our present study we have conducted single ascending dose, safety, and pharmacokinetic evaluation in healthy human volunteers with the purpose of enabling translation for tuberculosis. METHODS: This study was conducted as a single-center, ascending-dose, placebo-controlled, double blind design. Three ascending dose were chosen (250 , 500 , and 1000 mg) to be administered as a single oral dose. The volunteers were screened for potential eligibility. Participants were randomized to receive either Econazole or Placebo in a 6:2 design. Safety assessments and pharmacokinetic evaluations were carried out for each cohort. RESULTS: Econazole was found to be safe at all dose levels. No serious or severe adverse events occurred during the study. The AUC (0-∞) showed a response relationship with a value of 49 ± 3.47 h* µg/ml, 17. 86 ± 8.40 hr* µg/ml, 35.54 ± 13.94 hr* µg/ml for 250 mg, 500 mg, and 1000 mg, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of our study, a dose of 500 mg Econazole, once a day orally was considered as appropriate for further evaluation.

Pharmacometabolomics-guided clozapine therapy in treatment resistant schizophrenia: Preliminary exploration of future too near.

AIM: To study the association of clozapine pharmacometabolomics and clozapine response in Asian patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). METHOD: A cross-sectional study was performed on 50 consecutive TRS patients following up in psychiatry department of the tertiary care hospital. Demographic details, response assessment, were collected on the case record form. A blood sample was also collected for trough concentration assessment of drug and its metabolites. Clozapine (CLZ) the parent drug and its two major metabolites - Clozapine N oxide (CNO) and N-Desmethyl clozapine (N-DSMC) levels were assessed using a high-performance liquid chromatography method. Clozapine responders and nonresponders patients were classified based upon Andreasen criteria. RESULTS: The average trough concentration of CNO, N-DSMC, and CLZ were 123 ± 76.04, 171.93 ± 93.24, 229.27 ± 124.25 ng/ml, respectively. The two patient subgroups did not differ for CLZ, CNO, and N-DSMC concentrations statistically. However, clozapine nonresponse was associated with a higher CLZ/N-DSMC ratio (p = 0.03) and clozapine dose (p = 0.01). The receiver operator characteristic curve showed that the cut-off CLZ/N-DSMC ratio of 1.54 with a sensitivity of 85% and a positive predictive value of 84% for identifying nonresponders. CONCLUSION: CLZ/N-DSMC ratio and clozapine dose were identified as significant variables for future dose optimization algorithms. Pharmacometabolomics-guided clozapine therapy has the potential to revolutionize TRS management.